[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82bd43af-1d90-4395-b868-4a045bf4a47b@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 15:28:32 +0800
From: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: fix unexpected SMC_CLC_DECL_ERR_REGRMB error
在 2022/3/1 下午9:17, D. Wythe 写道:
> From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> Remove connections from link group is not synchronous with handling
> SMC_LLC_DELETE_RKEY, which means that even the number of connections is
> less that SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX, it does not mean that the connection can
> register rtoken successfully later, in other words, the rtoken entry may
> have not been released. This will cause an unexpected
> SMC_CLC_DECL_ERR_REGRMB to be reported, and then ths smc connection have
> to fallback to TCP.
>
IMHO, if there are SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX connections in the link group now,
one of them is being removed and here comes a new connection at this moment,
then:
(1) without this patch, the new connection will be added into the old link group
but fallback if the removing connection has not finished unregistering its rmb.
(2) with this patch, a new link group will be created and the new connection
will be added into the new link group.
I am wondering if (1) should be considered as a issue, or just a bydesign?
If it is a issue, I think this patch works, Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
Best Regards,
Wen Gu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists