[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6621a7b-12ad-1e3d-848f-fff576be2dfd@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 18:31:11 +0100
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xdp: xdp_mem_allocator can be NULL in
trace_mem_connect().
On 03/03/2022 15.12, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2022-03-03 14:59:47 [+0100], Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> writes:
>>
>>> Since the commit mentioned below __xdp_reg_mem_model() can return a NULL
>>> pointer. This pointer is dereferenced in trace_mem_connect() which leads
>>> to segfault. It can be reproduced with enabled trace events during ifup.
>>>
>>> Only assign the arguments in the trace-event macro if `xa' is set.
>>> Otherwise set the parameters to 0.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 4a48ef70b93b8 ("xdp: Allow registering memory model without rxq reference")
>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
>>
>> Hmm, so before the commit you mention, the tracepoint wasn't triggered
>> at all in the code path that now sets xdp_alloc is NULL. So I'm
>> wondering if we should just do the same here? Is the trace event useful
>> in all cases?
>
> Correct. It says:
> | ip-1230 [003] ..... 3.053473: mem_connect: mem_id=0 mem_type=PAGE_SHARED allocator=0000000000000000 ifindex=2
>
>> Alternatively, if we keep it, I think the mem.id and mem.type should be
>> available from rxq->mem, right?
>
> Yes, if these are the same things. In my case they are also 0:
>
> | ip-1245 [000] ..... 3.045684: mem_connect: mem_id=0 mem_type=PAGE_SHARED allocator=0000000000000000 ifindex=2
> | ifconfig-1332 [003] ..... 21.030879: mem_connect: mem_id=0 mem_type=PAGE_SHARED allocator=0000000000000000 ifindex=3
>
> So depends on what makes sense that tp can be skipped for xa == NULL or
> remain with
> __entry->mem_id = rxq->mem.id;
> __entry->mem_type = rxq->mem.type;
> __entry->allocator = xa ? xa->allocator : NULL;
>
> if it makes sense.
>
I have two bpftrace scripts [1] and [2] that use this tracepoint.
It is scripts to help driver developers detect memory leaks when using
page_pool from their drivers.
I'm a little pressured on time, so I've not evaluated if your change
makes sense.
In the scripts I do use both mem.id and mem.type.
[1]
https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/mem/bpftrace/xdp_mem_track01.bt
[2]
https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/mem/bpftrace/xdp_mem_track02.bt
--Jesper
Powered by blists - more mailing lists