[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e50ceabe3f1ea4007249afb6a30bda8996884c7.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 11:26:06 -0800
From: Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Coco Li <lixiaoyan@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 04/14] ipv6: add struct hop_jumbo_hdr
definition
On Thu, 2022-03-03 at 10:15 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> Following patches will need to add and remove local IPv6 jumbogram
> options to enable BIG TCP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/net/ipv6.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/ipv6.h b/include/net/ipv6.h
> index 213612f1680c7c39f4c07f0c05b4e6cf34a7878e..95f405cde9e539d7909b6b89af2b956655f38b94 100644
> --- a/include/net/ipv6.h
> +++ b/include/net/ipv6.h
> @@ -151,6 +151,17 @@ struct frag_hdr {
> __be32 identification;
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Jumbo payload option, as described in RFC 2676 2.
> + */
The RFC number is 2675 isn't it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists