netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 6/7] net/smc: don't req

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Mar 2022 09:19:27 +0100
From:   Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com
Cc:     Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/7] net/smc: don't req_notify until all CQEs
 drained

On 01/03/2022 11:53, dust.li wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:14:15PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 05:44:01PM +0800, Dust Li wrote:
>> 1. Please remove "--Guangguan Wang".
>> 2. We already discussed that. SMC should be changed to use RDMA CQ pool API
>> drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c.
>> ib_poll_handler() has much better implementation (tracing, IRQ rescheduling,
>> proper error handling) than this SMC variant.
> 
> OK, I'll remove this patch in the next version.

Looks like this one was accepted already, but per discussion (and I agree with that) -
please revert this patch. Thank you.