lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 5 Mar 2022 09:55:23 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Coco Li <lixiaoyan@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 08/14] ipv6: Add hop-by-hop header to
 jumbograms in ip6_output

On 3/3/22 11:16 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/ipv6.h b/include/linux/ipv6.h
> index 16870f86c74d3d1f5dfb7edac1e7db85f1ef6755..93b273db1c9926aba4199f486ce90778311916f5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ipv6.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ipv6.h
> @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ struct inet6_skb_parm {
>  #define IP6SKB_L3SLAVE         64
>  #define IP6SKB_JUMBOGRAM      128
>  #define IP6SKB_SEG6	      256
> +#define IP6SKB_FAKEJUMBO      512
>  };
>  

Why is this considered a FAKEJUMBO? The proper header is getting added
correct?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ