netdev - RE: [PATCH v3] rdma: Fix res_print_uint() and add res_print

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OSAPR01MB75671F748C7F91E972132BE6E3079@OSAPR01MB7567.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sun, 6 Mar 2022 07:00:12 +0000
From:   Shangyan Zhou <sy.zhou@...mail.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] rdma: Fix res_print_uint() and add res_print_u64()

Got it. I renamed it and submitted a new version. 

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> 
Sent: Saturday, March 5, 2022 1:34 AM
To: Shangyan Zhou <sy.zhou@...mail.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rdma: Fix res_print_uint() and add res_print_u64()

On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 08:46:37PM +0800, Shangyan Zhou wrote:
> Use the corresponding function and fmt string to print unsigned int32 
> and int64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shangyan Zhou <sy.zhou@...mail.com>
> ---
>  rdma/res-cq.c |  2 +-
>  rdma/res-mr.c |  2 +-
>  rdma/res-pd.c |  2 +-
>  rdma/res.c    | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  rdma/res.h    |  4 +++-
>  rdma/stat.c   |  4 ++--
>  6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/rdma/res-cq.c b/rdma/res-cq.c index 9e7c4f51..475179c8 
> 100644
> --- a/rdma/res-cq.c
> +++ b/rdma/res-cq.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static int res_cq_line(struct rd *rd, const char *name, int idx,
>  	print_dev(rd, idx, name);
>  	res_print_uint(rd, "cqn", cqn, nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CQN]);
>  	res_print_uint(rd, "cqe", cqe, nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CQE]);
> -	res_print_uint(rd, "users", users,
> +	res_print_u64(rd, "users", users,
>  		       nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_USECNT]);
>  	print_poll_ctx(rd, poll_ctx, nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_POLL_CTX]);
>  	print_cq_dim_setting(rd, nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_DEV_DIM]);
> diff --git a/rdma/res-mr.c b/rdma/res-mr.c index 1bf73f3a..a5b1ec5d 
> 100644
> --- a/rdma/res-mr.c
> +++ b/rdma/res-mr.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static int res_mr_line(struct rd *rd, const char *name, int idx,
>  	print_key(rd, "rkey", rkey, nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_RKEY]);
>  	print_key(rd, "lkey", lkey, nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_LKEY]);
>  	print_key(rd, "iova", iova, nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_IOVA]);
> -	res_print_uint(rd, "mrlen", mrlen, nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_MRLEN]);
> +	res_print_u64(rd, "mrlen", mrlen, 
> +nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_MRLEN]);
>  	res_print_uint(rd, "pdn", pdn, nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_PDN]);
>  	res_print_uint(rd, "pid", pid, nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_PID]);
>  	print_comm(rd, comm, nla_line);
> diff --git a/rdma/res-pd.c b/rdma/res-pd.c index df538010..6fec787c 
> 100644
> --- a/rdma/res-pd.c
> +++ b/rdma/res-pd.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int res_pd_line(struct rd *rd, const char *name, int idx,
>  	res_print_uint(rd, "pdn", pdn, nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_PDN]);
>  	print_key(rd, "local_dma_lkey", local_dma_lkey,
>  		  nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_LOCAL_DMA_LKEY]);
> -	res_print_uint(rd, "users", users,
> +	res_print_u64(rd, "users", users,
>  		       nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_USECNT]);
>  	print_key(rd, "unsafe_global_rkey", unsafe_global_rkey,
>  		  nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_UNSAFE_GLOBAL_RKEY]);
> diff --git a/rdma/res.c b/rdma/res.c
> index 21fef9bd..62599095 100644
> --- a/rdma/res.c
> +++ b/rdma/res.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int res_print_summary(struct rd *rd, struct 
> nlattr **tb)
>  
>  		name = mnl_attr_get_str(nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_SUMMARY_ENTRY_NAME]);
>  		curr = mnl_attr_get_u64(nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_SUMMARY_ENTRY_CURR]);
> -		res_print_uint(
> +		res_print_u64(
>  			rd, name, curr,
>  			nla_line[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_SUMMARY_ENTRY_CURR]);
>  	}
> @@ -208,13 +208,22 @@ void print_key(struct rd *rd, const char *name, uint64_t val,
>  	print_color_hex(PRINT_ANY, COLOR_NONE, name, " 0x%" PRIx64 " ", 
> val);  }
>  
> -void res_print_uint(struct rd *rd, const char *name, uint64_t val,
> +void res_print_uint(struct rd *rd, const char *name, uint32_t val,
>  		    struct nlattr *nlattr)

It is res_print_u32() now and not res_print_uint().
But it is nitpicking.

Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>