[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220306215032.GA10311@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 13:50:32 -0800
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
Cc: yangbo.lu@....com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, mlichvar@...hat.com,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] ptp: Support hardware clocks with
additional free running time
On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 07:38:55PM +0100, Gerhard Engleder wrote:
> How can I cover my use case with the existing API? I had no idea so far.
Okay, so 2 PHCs doesn't help, but still all you need is:
1. a different method to convert time stamps to vclock time base
2. a different method for vclocks' gettime
So let me suggest a much smaller change to the phc/vclock api... stay tuned
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists