netdev - [PATCH net-next] net: lan966x: Add spinlock for frame transmission from CPU.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220308102904.3978779-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 11:29:04 +0100
From:   Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <kuba@...nel.org>, Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: lan966x: Add spinlock for frame transmission from CPU.

The registers used to inject a frame to one of the ports is shared
between all the net devices. Therefore, there can be race conditions for
accessing the registers when two processes send frames at the same time
on different ports.

To fix this, add a spinlock around the function
'lan966x_port_ifh_xmit()'.

Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 9 ++++++++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
index 750f2cc2f695..81c01665d01e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
@@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ static void lan966x_ifh_set_timestamp(void *ifh, u64 timestamp)
 static int lan966x_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	struct lan966x_port *port = netdev_priv(dev);
+	struct lan966x *lan966x = port->lan966x;
 	__be32 ifh[IFH_LEN];
 	int err;
 
@@ -338,7 +339,11 @@ static int lan966x_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 		lan966x_ifh_set_timestamp(ifh, LAN966X_SKB_CB(skb)->ts_id);
 	}
 
-	return lan966x_port_ifh_xmit(skb, ifh, dev);
+	spin_lock(&lan966x->tx_lock);
+	err = lan966x_port_ifh_xmit(skb, ifh, dev);
+	spin_unlock(&lan966x->tx_lock);
+
+	return err;
 }
 
 static int lan966x_port_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
@@ -885,6 +890,8 @@ static void lan966x_init(struct lan966x *lan966x)
 	lan_rmw(ANA_ANAINTR_INTR_ENA_SET(1),
 		ANA_ANAINTR_INTR_ENA,
 		lan966x, ANA_ANAINTR);
+
+	spin_lock_init(&lan966x->tx_lock);
 }
 
 static int lan966x_ram_init(struct lan966x *lan966x)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h
index 058e43531818..ae282da1da74 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h
@@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ struct lan966x {
 
 	u8 base_mac[ETH_ALEN];
 
+	spinlock_t tx_lock; /* lock for frame transmition */
+
 	struct net_device *bridge;
 	u16 bridge_mask;
 	u16 bridge_fwd_mask;
-- 
2.33.0