netdev - Re: [PATCH 02/10] bpf: Add multi kprobe link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEf4BzaJoa=N4LgT55oraJkJtBds4BmKBCpJ1wmyqZCfjdo3Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Mar 2022 17:23:34 -0800
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] bpf: Add multi kprobe link

On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 9:28 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 03:11:01PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > > +static int
> > > +kprobe_multi_resolve_syms(const void *usyms, u32 cnt,
> > > +                         unsigned long *addrs)
> > > +{
> > > +       unsigned long addr, size;
> > > +       const char **syms;
> > > +       int err = -ENOMEM;
> > > +       unsigned int i;
> > > +       char *func;
> > > +
> > > +       size = cnt * sizeof(*syms);
> > > +       syms = kvzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +       if (!syms)
> > > +               return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +       func = kmalloc(KSYM_NAME_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +       if (!func)
> > > +               goto error;
> > > +
> > > +       if (copy_from_user(syms, usyms, size)) {
> > > +               err = -EFAULT;
> > > +               goto error;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
> > > +               err = strncpy_from_user(func, syms[i], KSYM_NAME_LEN);
> > > +               if (err == KSYM_NAME_LEN)
> > > +                       err = -E2BIG;
> > > +               if (err < 0)
> > > +                       goto error;
> > > +
> > > +               err = -EINVAL;
> > > +               if (func[0] == '\0')
> > > +                       goto error;
> >
> > wouldn't empty string be handled by kallsyms_lookup_name?
>
> it would scan and compare all symbols with empty string,
> so it's better to test for it

I don't mind, but it seems like kallsyms_lookup_name() should be made
smarter than that instead, no?


>
> jirka
>
> >
> > > +               addr = kallsyms_lookup_name(func);
> > > +               if (!addr)
> > > +                       goto error;
> > > +               if (!kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(addr, &size, NULL))
> > > +                       size = MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE;
> > > +               addr = ftrace_location_range(addr, addr + size - 1);
> > > +               if (!addr)
> > > +                       goto error;
> > > +               addrs[i] = addr;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       err = 0;
> > > +error:
> > > +       kvfree(syms);
> > > +       kfree(func);
> > > +       return err;
> > > +}
> > > +
> >
> > [...]