netdev - Re: Regression in add xfrm interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220308084520.18ddd3e2@hermes.local>
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 08:45:20 -0800
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>
Cc:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Regression in add xfrm interface

On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 14:51:30 +0100
Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com> wrote:

> Hi Stephen,
> 
> As Steffen explained bellow if_id = 0 is likely to cause problems in the long
> term. Should we revert the commit because it broke userspace tools?
> 
> I notice the Debian bug is in a iproute2 testsuite, also it is in Debian testing! How about fixing test case than reverting the kernel commit?
> 

This is testsuite in iproute2. Please submit a patch to fix it.
This is not a Debian test.