[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YicNXOlH8al/Rlk3@google.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 08:01:32 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: jasowang@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+adc3cb32385586bec859@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vhost: Protect the virtqueue from being cleared
whilst still in use
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 07:17:57PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick() already holds the mutex during its call
> > to vhost_get_vq_desc(). All we have to do here is take the same lock
> > during virtqueue clean-up and we mitigate the reported issues.
>
> Pls just basically copy the code comment here. this is just confuses.
>
> > Also WARN() as a precautionary measure. The purpose of this is to
> > capture possible future race conditions which may pop up over time.
> >
> > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=279432d30d825e63ba00
>
> And this is a bug we already fixed, right?
Well, this was the bug I set out to fix.
I didn't know your patch was in flight at the time.
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > Reported-by: syzbot+adc3cb32385586bec859@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> not really applicable anymore ...
I can remove these if it helps.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists