Date:   Wed, 9 Mar 2022 14:46:01 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...dia.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
        linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/26] virtio_ring: split: extract the logic of
 creating vring


在 2022/3/8 下午8:34, Xuan Zhuo 写道:
> Separate the logic of split to create vring queue.
>
> For the convenience of passing parameters, add a structure
> vring_split.
>
> This feature is required for subsequent virtuqueue reset vring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>   drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>   1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index b87130c8f312..d32793615451 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,13 @@ struct vring_desc_extra {
>   	u16 next;			/* The next desc state in a list. */
>   };
>   
> +struct vring_split {
> +	void *queue;
> +	dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> +	size_t queue_size_in_bytes;
> +	struct vring vring;
> +};


So this structure will be only used in vring_create_vring_split() which 
seems not that useful.

More see below.


> +
>   struct vring_virtqueue {
>   	struct virtqueue vq;
>   
> @@ -915,28 +922,21 @@ static void *virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
>   	return NULL;
>   }
>   
> -static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split(
> -	unsigned int index,
> -	unsigned int num,
> -	unsigned int vring_align,
> -	struct virtio_device *vdev,
> -	bool weak_barriers,
> -	bool may_reduce_num,
> -	bool context,
> -	bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *),
> -	void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *),
> -	const char *name)
> +static int vring_create_vring_split(struct vring_split *vring,
> +				    struct virtio_device *vdev,
> +				    unsigned int vring_align,
> +				    bool weak_barriers,
> +				    bool may_reduce_num,
> +				    u32 num)


I'd rename this as vring_alloc_queue_split() and let it simply return 
the address of queue like vring_alloc_queue().

And let it simple accept dma_addr_t *dma_adder instead of vring_split.


>   {
> -	struct virtqueue *vq;
>   	void *queue = NULL;
>   	dma_addr_t dma_addr;
>   	size_t queue_size_in_bytes;
> -	struct vring vring;
>   
>   	/* We assume num is a power of 2. */
>   	if (num & (num - 1)) {
>   		dev_warn(&vdev->dev, "Bad virtqueue length %u\n", num);
> -		return NULL;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   
>   	/* TODO: allocate each queue chunk individually */
> @@ -947,11 +947,11 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split(
>   		if (queue)
>   			break;
>   		if (!may_reduce_num)
> -			return NULL;
> +			return -ENOMEM;
>   	}
>   
>   	if (!num)
> -		return NULL;
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>   
>   	if (!queue) {
>   		/* Try to get a single page. You are my only hope! */
> @@ -959,21 +959,49 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split(
>   					  &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
>   	}
>   	if (!queue)
> -		return NULL;
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>   
>   	queue_size_in_bytes = vring_size(num, vring_align);
> -	vring_init(&vring, num, queue, vring_align);
> +	vring_init(&vring->vring, num, queue, vring_align);


It's better to move this to its caller (vring_create_virtqueue_split), 
so we have rather simple logic below:



> +
> +	vring->dma_addr = dma_addr;
> +	vring->queue = queue;
> +	vring->queue_size_in_bytes = queue_size_in_bytes;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split(
> +	unsigned int index,
> +	unsigned int num,
> +	unsigned int vring_align,
> +	struct virtio_device *vdev,
> +	bool weak_barriers,
> +	bool may_reduce_num,
> +	bool context,
> +	bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *),
> +	void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *),
> +	const char *name)
> +{
> +	struct vring_split vring;
> +	struct virtqueue *vq;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	err = vring_create_vring_split(&vring, vdev, vring_align, weak_barriers,
> +				       may_reduce_num, num);
> +	if (err)
> +		return NULL;


queue = vring_alloc_queue_split(vdev, &dma_addr, ...);

if (!queue)

     return -ENOMEM;

vring_init();

...

Thanks


>   
> -	vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring, vdev, weak_barriers, context,
> +	vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring.vring, vdev, weak_barriers, context,
>   				   notify, callback, name);
>   	if (!vq) {
> -		vring_free_queue(vdev, queue_size_in_bytes, queue,
> -				 dma_addr);
> +		vring_free_queue(vdev, vring.queue_size_in_bytes, vring.queue,
> +				 vring.dma_addr);
>   		return NULL;
>   	}
>   
> -	to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = dma_addr;
> -	to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = queue_size_in_bytes;
> +	to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = vring.dma_addr;
> +	to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = vring.queue_size_in_bytes;
>   	to_vvq(vq)->we_own_ring = true;
>   
>   	return vq;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists