lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220310150506.GA1939@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 10 Mar 2022 16:05:06 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Mingbao Sun <sunmingbao@....com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tyler.sun@...l.com,
        ping.gan@...l.com, yanxiu.cai@...l.com, libin.zhang@...l.com,
        ao.sun@...l.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: export symbol tcp_set_congestion_control

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:03:00PM +0800, Mingbao Sun wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:11:35 +0100
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> 
> > Please submit this together with the actual user(s) in a series.
> > Patches to just export random symbols are a no-go.
> 
> Got it.
> many thanks for informing.
> 
> BTW:
> could you give me the answer to the following questions?
> 1. Against which repo should I prepare and test this series of patches?
>    netdev or nvme?

I think for the initial RFC either is fine, just clearly state which.

> 2. what's the recipients for this series of patches?
>    netdev or nvme or both?

both.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ