[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77a44185-c9cd-21f5-125f-b8eec7a66537@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:04:14 -0800
From: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
syzbot+e223cf47ec8ae183f2a0@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ipv6: fix skb_over_panic in __ip6_append_data
On 3/10/22 14:43, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 5:30 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:13:28 -0800 Tadeusz Struk wrote:
>>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
>>> index 4788f6b37053..6d45112322a0 100644
>>> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
>>> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
>>> @@ -1649,6 +1649,16 @@ static int __ip6_append_data(struct sock *sk,
>>> skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
>>> skb->ip_summed = csummode;
>>> skb->csum = 0;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Check if there is still room for payload
>>> + */
>>
>> TBH I think the check is self-explanatory. Not worth a banner comment,
>> for sure.
>>
>>> + if (fragheaderlen >= mtu) {
>>> + err = -EMSGSIZE;
>>> + kfree_skb(skb);
>>> + goto error;
>>> + }
>>
>> Not sure if Willem prefers this placement, but seems like we can lift
>> this check out of the loop, as soon as fragheaderlen and mtu are known.
>>
>>> /* reserve for fragmentation and ipsec header */
>>> skb_reserve(skb, hh_len + sizeof(struct frag_hdr) +
>>> dst_exthdrlen);
>
> Just updating this boundary check will do?
>
> if (mtu < fragheaderlen ||
> ((mtu - fragheaderlen) & ~7) + fragheaderlen <
> sizeof(struct frag_hdr))
> goto emsgsize;
Yes, it will. v3 on its way.
--
Thanks,
Tadeusz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists