netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] vsock: each transport cycles only on its own sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Mar 2022 17:08:53 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        Jiyong Park <jiyong@...gle.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, adelva@...gle.com,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vsock: each transport cycles only on its own sockets

On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:28:03 -0500 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 03:14:20PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:50:11PM +0900, Jiyong Park wrote:  
> > > When iterating over sockets using vsock_for_each_connected_socket, make
> > > sure that a transport filters out sockets that don't belong to the
> > > transport.
> > > 
> > > There actually was an issue caused by this; in a nested VM
> > > configuration, destroying the nested VM (which often involves the
> > > closing of /dev/vhost-vsock if there was h2g connections to the nested
> > > VM) kills not only the h2g connections, but also all existing g2h
> > > connections to the (outmost) host which are totally unrelated.
> > > 
> > > Tested: Executed the following steps on Cuttlefish (Android running on a
> > > VM) [1]: (1) Enter into an `adb shell` session - to have a g2h
> > > connection inside the VM, (2) open and then close /dev/vhost-vsock by
> > > `exec 3< /dev/vhost-vsock && exec 3<&-`, (3) observe that the adb
> > > session is not reset.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://android.googlesource.com/device/google/cuttlefish/
> > > 
> > > Fixes: c0cfa2d8a788 ("vsock: add multi-transports support")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiyong Park <jiyong@...gle.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v3:
> > >  - Fixed the build error in vmci_transport.c
> > > Changes in v2:
> > >  - Squashed into a single patch
> > > 
> > > drivers/vhost/vsock.c            | 3 ++-
> > > include/net/af_vsock.h           | 3 ++-
> > > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c         | 9 +++++++--
> > > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 7 +++++--
> > > net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c   | 5 ++++-
> > > 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)  
> > 
> > It seems okay now, I ran my test suite and everything seems to be fine:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
> 
> Thanks!
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> 
> Not a new regression so I think we should take this in the next cycle,
> let's be careful here especially since previous version was not even
> build-tested by the contributor.

Ack, our build bot ignored it as well :( 

Jiyong, would you mind collecting the tags from Stefano and Michael 
and reposting? I fixed our build bot, it should build test the patch
- I can't re-run on an already ignored patch, sadly.