[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220311150842.GC7817@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 07:08:42 -0800
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, hkallweit1@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Madhuri.Sripada@...rochip.com, Manohar.Puri@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] dt-bindings: net: micrel: Configure latency
values and timestamping check for LAN8814 phy
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 03:28:14PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> What about adding only some sane values in the driver like here [1].
> And the allow the user to use linuxptp to fine tune all this.
I mean, that is the point. Users will surely have to tune it
themselves, second guessing the driver in any case. So having hard
coded constants in the driver is useless.
Probably even the tuned values will differ by link speed, so having
the per-link speed constants in the driver doesn't help either.
(And yes, linuxptp should offer configuration variables per link
speed, monitor actual link speed, and switch automatically. So far no
one is demanding that loudly)
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists