netdev - Re: [PATCH] Revert "xfrm: state and policy should fail if XFRMA_IF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <076e8c72-b842-64a8-7a4b-9a3b30715b5d@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Mar 2022 13:19:19 +0100
From:   Kai Lueke <kailueke@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paul Chaignon <paul@...ium.io>,
        Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "xfrm: state and policy should fail if XFRMA_IF_ID
 0"

I forgot to CC stable@ when submitting, doing it now:
Can this be picked for the next round of stable kernels (down to 5.10)?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a3d9001b4e287fc043e5539d03d71a32ab114bcb

Thanks,
Kai

On 07.03.2022 09:22, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 03:55:10PM +0100, kailueke@...ux.microsoft.com wrote:
>> From: Kai Lueke <kailueke@...ux.microsoft.com>
>>
>> This reverts commit 68ac0f3810e76a853b5f7b90601a05c3048b8b54 because ID
>> 0 was meant to be used for configuring the policy/state without
>> matching for a specific interface (e.g., Cilium is affected, see
>> https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/18789 and
>> https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/19019).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kai Lueke <kailueke@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Applied, thanks Kai!