lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:33:49 +0800
From:   Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     stephen@...workplumber.org, kys@...rosoft.com,
        haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
        decui@...rosoft.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com,
        songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv_netvsc: Add check for kvmalloc_array

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 02:43:48PM +0800, Greg KH wrote:
>> As the potential failure of the kvmalloc_array(),
>> it should be better to check and restore the 'data'
>> if fails in order to avoid the dereference of the
>> NULL pointer.
>> 
>> Fixes: 6ae746711263 ("hv_netvsc: Add per-cpu ethtool stats for netvsc")
>> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c | 6 ++++++
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
>> index 3646469433b1..018c4a5f6f44 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
>> @@ -1587,6 +1587,12 @@ static void netvsc_get_ethtool_stats(struct net_device *dev,
>>  	pcpu_sum = kvmalloc_array(num_possible_cpus(),
>>  				  sizeof(struct netvsc_ethtool_pcpu_stats),
>>  				  GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!pcpu_sum) {
>> +		for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
>> +			data[j] = 0;
>> +		return;
>> +	}
> 
>How did you test this to verify it is correct?

Thanks, I have tested the patch by kernel_patch_verify,
and all the tests are passed.

Jiang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ