netdev - Re: [PATCH] hv_netvsc: Add check for kvmalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Mar 2022 16:35:00 +0800
From:   Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     stephen@...workplumber.org, kys@...rosoft.com,
        haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
        decui@...rosoft.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com,
        songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv_netvsc: Add check for kvmalloc_array

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:13:59PM +0800, Greg KH wrote:
>> The failure of allocation is not included in the tests.
>> And as far as I know, there is not any tool that has the
>> ability to fail the allocation.
> 
> There are tools that do this.
> 

Thanks, could you please tell me the tools?

Jiang

>> But I think that for safety, the cost of redundant and harmless
>> check is acceptable.
>> Also, checking after allocation is a good program pattern.
> 
> That's fine, it's how you clean up that is the problem that not everyone
> gets correct, which is why it is good to verify that you do not
> introduce problems.