lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Mar 2022 09:42:57 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     Krasnov Arseniy Vladimirovich <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc:     Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
        Rokosov Dmitry Dmitrievich <DDRokosov@...rdevices.ru>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] af_vsock: add two new tests for SOCK_SEQPACKET

Hi Arseniy,

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 10:52:36AM +0000, Krasnov Arseniy Vladimirovich wrote:
>This adds two tests: for receive timeout and reading to invalid
>buffer provided by user. I forgot to put both patches to main
>patchset.
>
>Arseniy Krasnov(2):
>
>af_vsock: SOCK_SEQPACKET receive timeout test
>af_vsock: SOCK_SEQPACKET broken buffer test
>
>tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>1 file changed, 170 insertions(+)

Thank you for these tests!

I left a few comments and I'm not sure about the 'broken buffer test' 
behavior.

About the series, it sounds like something is wrong with your setup, 
usually the cover letter is "patch" 0. In this case I would have 
expected:

     [0/2] af_vsock: add two new tests for SOCK_SEQPACKET
     [1/2] af_vsock: SOCK_SEQPACKET receive timeout test
     [2/2] af_vsock: SOCK_SEQPACKET broken buffer test

Are you using `git send-email` or `git publish`?


When you will remove the RFC, please add `net-next` label:
[PATCH net-next 0/2], etc..

Thanks,
Stefano

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ