[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iLv-t6EKDfVdbSpU=627yqD-k1VVzRrhddUr6wf-k0=Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 09:10:41 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
Cc: Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Coco Li <lixiaoyan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 06/14] ipv6/gro: insert temporary HBH/jumbo header
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 9:04 AM Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 9:02 AM
> > To: Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>; David S . Miller
> > <davem@...emloft.net>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; netdev
> > <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>;
> > Coco Li <lixiaoyan@...gle.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 06/14] ipv6/gro: insert temporary
> > HBH/jumbo header
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 8:24 AM Alexander H Duyck
> > <alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2022-03-09 at 21:46 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > > >
> > > > Following patch will add GRO_IPV6_MAX_SIZE, allowing gro to build
> > > > BIG TCP ipv6 packets (bigger than 64K).
> > > >
> > >
> > > This looks like it belongs in the next patch, not this one. This patch
> > > is adding the HBH header.
> >
> > What do you mean by "it belongs" ?
> >
> > Do you want me to squash the patches, or remove the first sentence ?
> >
> > I am confused.
>
> It is about the sentence. Your next patch essentially has that as the title and actually does add GRO_IPV6_MAX_SIZE. I wasn't sure if you reordered the patches or split them. However as I recall I didn't see anything in this patch that added GRO_IPV6_MAX_SIZE.
I used "Following patch will", meaning the patch following _this_ one,
sorry if this is confusing.
I would have used "This patch is ..." if I wanted to describe what
this patch is doing.
Patches were not reordered, and have two different authors.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists