[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220315115644.66fab74b@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:56:44 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 2/6] netfilter: nf_tables: Reject tables of
unsupported family
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 10:15:09 +0100 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> + return false
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NF_TABLES_INET
> + || family == NFPROTO_INET
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NF_TABLES_IPV4
> + || family == NFPROTO_IPV4
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NF_TABLES_ARP
> + || family == NFPROTO_ARP
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NF_TABLES_NETDEV
> + || family == NFPROTO_NETDEV
> +#endif
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_TABLES_BRIDGE)
is there a reason this one is IS_ENABLED() and everything else is ifdef?
> + || family == NFPROTO_BRIDGE
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NF_TABLES_IPV6
> + || family == NFPROTO_IPV6
> +#endif
> + ;
return (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_TABLES_INET) && family == NFPROTO_INET)) ||
(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_TABLES_IPV4) && family == NFPROTO_IPV4)) ||
...
would have also been an option, for future reference.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists