| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHsH6GsW6=OK+=CxaLw_=bcDFspNO4nPmDOTdytpJJYih6khgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 05:50:43 +0200
From: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, shmulik.ladkani@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: geneve: support IPv4/IPv6 as inner protocol
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 2:33 AM Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 3/15/22 13:22, Eyal Birger wrote:
> > Hi Roopa,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 9:57 PM Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/15/22 11:56, Eyal Birger wrote:
> >>> This patch adds support for encapsulating IPv4/IPv6 within GENEVE.
> >>>
> >>> In order use this, a new IFLA_GENEVE_TUN flag needs to be provided at
> >>> device creation. This property cannot be changed for the time being.
> >>>
> >>> In case IP traffic is received on a non-tun device the drop count is
> >>> increased.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/net/geneve.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >>> include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 1 +
> >>> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/geneve.c b/drivers/net/geneve.c
> >>> index a895ff756093..37305ec26250 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/geneve.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/geneve.c
> >>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct geneve_config {
> >>> bool use_udp6_rx_checksums;
> >>> bool ttl_inherit;
> >>> enum ifla_geneve_df df;
> >>> + bool tun;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> /* Pseudo network device */
> >>> @@ -251,17 +252,24 @@ static void geneve_rx(struct geneve_dev *geneve, struct geneve_sock *gs,
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
> >>> - skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, geneve->dev);
> >>> - skb_postpull_rcsum(skb, eth_hdr(skb), ETH_HLEN);
> >>> -
> >>> if (tun_dst)
> >>> skb_dst_set(skb, &tun_dst->dst);
> >>>
> >>> - /* Ignore packet loops (and multicast echo) */
> >>> - if (ether_addr_equal(eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, geneve->dev->dev_addr)) {
> >>> - geneve->dev->stats.rx_errors++;
> >>> - goto drop;
> >>> + if (gnvh->proto_type == htons(ETH_P_TEB)) {
> >>> + skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
> >>> + skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, geneve->dev);
> >>> + skb_postpull_rcsum(skb, eth_hdr(skb), ETH_HLEN);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Ignore packet loops (and multicast echo) */
> >>> + if (ether_addr_equal(eth_hdr(skb)->h_source,
> >>> + geneve->dev->dev_addr)) {
> >>> + geneve->dev->stats.rx_errors++;
> >>> + goto drop;
> >>> + }
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
> >>> + skb->dev = geneve->dev;
> >>> + skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> oiph = skb_network_header(skb);
> >>> @@ -345,6 +353,7 @@ static int geneve_udp_encap_recv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>> struct genevehdr *geneveh;
> >>> struct geneve_dev *geneve;
> >>> struct geneve_sock *gs;
> >>> + __be16 inner_proto;
> >>> int opts_len;
> >>>
> >>> /* Need UDP and Geneve header to be present */
> >>> @@ -356,8 +365,13 @@ static int geneve_udp_encap_recv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>> if (unlikely(geneveh->ver != GENEVE_VER))
> >>> goto drop;
> >>>
> >>> - if (unlikely(geneveh->proto_type != htons(ETH_P_TEB)))
> >>> + inner_proto = geneveh->proto_type;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (unlikely((inner_proto != htons(ETH_P_TEB) &&
> >>> + inner_proto != htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
> >>> + inner_proto != htons(ETH_P_IPV6)))) {
> >>> goto drop;
> >>> + }
> >>>
> >>
> >> unnecessary braces
> > Will fix.
> >
> >>> gs = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sk);
> >>> if (!gs)
> >>> @@ -367,9 +381,13 @@ static int geneve_udp_encap_recv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>> if (!geneve)
> >>> goto drop;
> >>>
> >>> + if (unlikely((!geneve->cfg.tun && inner_proto != htons(ETH_P_TEB)))) {
> >>> + geneve->dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> >>> + goto drop;
> >>> + }
> >> Does this change current default behavior ?.
> >>
> >> its unclear to be what the current behavior is for a non ETH_P_TEB packet
> > Currently non ETH_P_TEB packets are silently dropped.
> > I figured that if the driver supported other ethertypes it would make
> > sense to increase the count in such case, to assist in debugging wrong
> > configurations.
> >
> > I can remove this if it's better to keep the current behavior.
>
> yes, agree. counting is better.
>
>
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> opts_len = geneveh->opt_len * 4;
> >>> - if (iptunnel_pull_header(skb, GENEVE_BASE_HLEN + opts_len,
> >>> - htons(ETH_P_TEB),
> >>> + if (iptunnel_pull_header(skb, GENEVE_BASE_HLEN + opts_len, inner_proto,
> >>> !net_eq(geneve->net, dev_net(geneve->dev)))) {
> >>> geneve->dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> >>> goto drop;
> >>> @@ -717,7 +735,8 @@ static int geneve_stop(struct net_device *dev)
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static void geneve_build_header(struct genevehdr *geneveh,
> >>> - const struct ip_tunnel_info *info)
> >>> + const struct ip_tunnel_info *info,
> >>> + __be16 inner_proto)
> >>> {
> >>> geneveh->ver = GENEVE_VER;
> >>> geneveh->opt_len = info->options_len / 4;
> >>> @@ -725,7 +744,7 @@ static void geneve_build_header(struct genevehdr *geneveh,
> >>> geneveh->critical = !!(info->key.tun_flags & TUNNEL_CRIT_OPT);
> >>> geneveh->rsvd1 = 0;
> >>> tunnel_id_to_vni(info->key.tun_id, geneveh->vni);
> >>> - geneveh->proto_type = htons(ETH_P_TEB);
> >>> + geneveh->proto_type = inner_proto;
> >>> geneveh->rsvd2 = 0;
> >>>
> >>> if (info->key.tun_flags & TUNNEL_GENEVE_OPT)
> >>> @@ -734,8 +753,9 @@ static void geneve_build_header(struct genevehdr *geneveh,
> >>>
> >>> static int geneve_build_skb(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sk_buff *skb,
> >>> const struct ip_tunnel_info *info,
> >>> - bool xnet, int ip_hdr_len)
> >>> + bool xnet, int ip_hdr_len, bool tun)
> >>> {
> >>> + __be16 inner_proto = tun ? skb->protocol : htons(ETH_P_TEB);
> >>> bool udp_sum = !!(info->key.tun_flags & TUNNEL_CSUM);
> >>> struct genevehdr *gnvh;
> >>> int min_headroom;
> >>> @@ -755,8 +775,8 @@ static int geneve_build_skb(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sk_buff *skb,
> >>> goto free_dst;
> >>>
> >>> gnvh = __skb_push(skb, sizeof(*gnvh) + info->options_len);
> >>> - geneve_build_header(gnvh, info);
> >>> - skb_set_inner_protocol(skb, htons(ETH_P_TEB));
> >>> + geneve_build_header(gnvh, info, inner_proto);
> >>> + skb_set_inner_protocol(skb, inner_proto);
> >>> return 0;
> >>>
> >>> free_dst:
> >>> @@ -959,7 +979,8 @@ static int geneve_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - err = geneve_build_skb(&rt->dst, skb, info, xnet, sizeof(struct iphdr));
> >>> + err = geneve_build_skb(&rt->dst, skb, info, xnet, sizeof(struct iphdr),
> >>> + geneve->cfg.tun);
> >>> if (unlikely(err))
> >>> return err;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1038,7 +1059,8 @@ static int geneve6_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> >>> ttl = key->ttl;
> >>> ttl = ttl ? : ip6_dst_hoplimit(dst);
> >>> }
> >>> - err = geneve_build_skb(dst, skb, info, xnet, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr));
> >>> + err = geneve_build_skb(dst, skb, info, xnet, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr),
> >>> + geneve->cfg.tun);
> >>> if (unlikely(err))
> >>> return err;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1388,6 +1410,14 @@ static int geneve_configure(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
> >>> dst_cache_reset(&geneve->cfg.info.dst_cache);
> >>> memcpy(&geneve->cfg, cfg, sizeof(*cfg));
> >>>
> >>> + if (geneve->cfg.tun) {
> >>> + dev->header_ops = NULL;
> >>> + dev->type = ARPHRD_NONE;
> >>> + dev->hard_header_len = 0;
> >>> + dev->addr_len = 0;
> >>> + dev->flags = IFF_NOARP;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> err = register_netdevice(dev);
> >>> if (err)
> >>> return err;
> >>> @@ -1561,10 +1591,18 @@ static int geneve_nl2info(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[],
> >>> #endif
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> + if (data[IFLA_GENEVE_TUN]) {
> >>> + if (changelink) {
> >>> + attrtype = IFLA_GENEVE_TUN;
> >>> + goto change_notsup;
> >>> + }
> >>> + cfg->tun = true;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> return 0;
> >>> change_notsup:
> >>> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, data[attrtype],
> >>> - "Changing VNI, Port, endpoint IP address family, external, and UDP checksum attributes are not supported");
> >>> + "Changing VNI, Port, endpoint IP address family, external, tun, and UDP checksum attributes are not supported");
> >>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1799,6 +1837,9 @@ static int geneve_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *dev)
> >>> if (nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_GENEVE_TTL_INHERIT, ttl_inherit))
> >>> goto nla_put_failure;
> >>>
> >>> + if (geneve->cfg.tun && nla_put_flag(skb, IFLA_GENEVE_TUN))
> >>> + goto nla_put_failure;
> >>> +
> >>> return 0;
> >>>
> >>> nla_put_failure:
> >>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >>> index bd24c7dc10a2..198aefa2c513 100644
> >>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >>> @@ -842,6 +842,7 @@ enum {
> >>> IFLA_GENEVE_LABEL,
> >>> IFLA_GENEVE_TTL_INHERIT,
> >>> IFLA_GENEVE_DF,
> >>> + IFLA_GENEVE_TUN,
> >> geneve is itself called a tunnel, i wonder if a different name for the
> >> flag would be more appropriate.
> > I tried to find a reference to something similar, so went with something like
> > the tun vs. tap distinction. I was also concerned about the possible
> > confusion, but it felt clearer than something like L3_INNER_PROTO_MODE.
> >
> > I'd happily replace it with a better suggestion.
>
> o ok, makes sense. I can't think of anything other than simply
> IFLA_GENEVE_INNER_PROTO
>
> (maybe others have better suggestions)
My concern with calling it IFLA_GENEVE_INNER_PROTO is that inner_proto is
used internally to denote the inner proto value.
Would IFLA_GENEVE_INNER_PROTO_INHERIT make sense?
>
>
> >
> >> what is the use case for this ?. is there a RFC reference ?
> > I stumbled upon this configuration when trying to receive packets from an
> > AWS "Gateway Load Balancer" which sends IP packets encapsulated in GENEVE [1].
> >
> > But to my understanding the RFC allows this so it doesn't seem something
> > specific to AWS.
>
> that makes me wonder if we need a knob atall and if this should be
> allowed by default.
I didn't find a way to make tx work without requiring a flag, so I thought
it'd be better if this mode was enforced in both directions.
>
> wonder how other network vendor standard geneve implementations behave
> by default.
>
>
> >
> > Thanks for the review!
> >
> > Eyal.
> >
> > [1] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fblogs%2Fnetworking-and-content-delivery%2Fintegrate-your-custom-logic-or-appliance-with-aws-gateway-load-balancer%2F&data=04%7C01%7Croopa%40nvidia.com%7C223c13c616ef430a487f08da06c19610%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637829725767772379%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=ZQTDrFJ8LLn5SdN6h%2B5NECxwlD9PAGV2KzpVUV%2B1chc%3D&reserved=0
>
> Thanks for the details.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists