netdev - [PATCH] rtw89: Fix spelling mistake "Mis-Match" -> "Mismatch"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Mar 2022 23:42:42 +0000
From:   Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
To:     Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rtw89: Fix spelling mistake "Mis-Match" -> "Mismatch"

There are some spelling mistakes in some literal strings. Fix them.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index 07f26718b66f..99abd0fe7f15 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -4623,12 +4623,12 @@ static void _show_cx_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
 	ver_hotfix = FIELD_GET(GENMASK(15, 8), chip->wlcx_desired);
 	seq_printf(m, "(%s, desired:%d.%d.%d), ",
 		   (wl->ver_info.fw_coex >= chip->wlcx_desired ?
-		   "Match" : "Mis-Match"), ver_main, ver_sub, ver_hotfix);
+		   "Match" : "Mismatch"), ver_main, ver_sub, ver_hotfix);
 
 	seq_printf(m, "BT_FW_coex:%d(%s, desired:%d)\n",
 		   bt->ver_info.fw_coex,
 		   (bt->ver_info.fw_coex >= chip->btcx_desired ?
-		   "Match" : "Mis-Match"), chip->btcx_desired);
+		   "Match" : "Mismatch"), chip->btcx_desired);
 
 	if (bt->enable.now && bt->ver_info.fw == 0)
 		rtw89_btc_fw_en_rpt(rtwdev, RPT_EN_BT_VER_INFO, true);
@@ -5075,7 +5075,7 @@ static void _show_dm_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
 	seq_printf(m, "leak_ap:%d, fw_offload:%s%s\n", dm->leak_ap,
 		   (BTC_CX_FW_OFFLOAD ? "Y" : "N"),
 		   (dm->wl_fw_cx_offload == BTC_CX_FW_OFFLOAD ?
-		    "" : "(Mis-Match!!)"));
+		    "" : "(Mismatch!!)"));
 
 	if (dm->rf_trx_para.wl_tx_power == 0xff)
 		seq_printf(m,
-- 
2.35.1