[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220316194614.3e38cadc@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 19:46:14 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@...cle.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net 2/2] af_unix: Support POLLPRI for OOB.
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 03:38:55 +0900 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> The commit 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support") introduced OOB for
> AF_UNIX, but it lacks some changes for POLLPRI. Let's add the missing
> piece.
>
> In the selftest, normal datagrams are sent followed by OOB data, so this
> commit replaces `POLLIN | POLLPRI` with just `POLLPRI` in the first test
> case.
>
> Fixes: 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support")
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> index 0c37e5595aae..f94afaa5a696 100644
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -2049,7 +2049,7 @@ static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> */
> #define UNIX_SKB_FRAGS_SZ (PAGE_SIZE << get_order(32768))
>
> -#if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AF_UNIX_OOB))
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AF_UNIX_OOB)
> static int queue_oob(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *other)
> {
> struct unix_sock *ousk = unix_sk(other);
> @@ -2115,7 +2115,7 @@ static int unix_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>
> err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_OOB) {
> -#if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AF_UNIX_OOB))
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AF_UNIX_OOB)
> if (len)
> len--;
> else
> @@ -2186,7 +2186,7 @@ static int unix_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> sent += size;
> }
>
> -#if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AF_UNIX_OOB))
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AF_UNIX_OOB)
> if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_OOB) {
> err = queue_oob(sock, msg, other);
> if (err)
If we want to keep this change structured as a fix and backported we
should avoid making unnecessary changes. Fixes need to be minimal
as per stable rules.
Could you make removal of the brackets a patch separate from this
series and targeted at net-next?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists