lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjTLUL0umgw+ZVTU@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2022 20:11:28 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "'Rafael J . Wysocki '" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] i2c: mux: pinctrl: remove CONFIG_OF dependency and
 use fwnode API

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:56:30PM +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> Le Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:28:45 +0200,
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> a écrit :
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:00:50PM +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> > > In order to use i2c muxes with software_node when added with a struct
> > > mfd_cell, switch to fwnode API. The fwnode layer will allow to use this
> > > with both device_node and software_node.  
> > 
> > > -	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > > +	struct fwnode_handle *np = dev_fwnode(dev);  
> > 
> > np is now a misleading name. Use fwnode.
> 
> Ok I thought np was meaning "node pointer" and it looked like okay to
> avoid avoid a diff that is too huge. But agreed, I'll rename that.

It's rather "in practice", np stands for "OF node pointer", while fwnode
stands for "firmware node handle".

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ