[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220319074240.554227-2-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 08:42:39 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] xfrm: delete duplicated functions that calls same xfrm_api_check()
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
The xfrm_dev_register() and xfrm_dev_feat_change() have same
implementation of one call to xfrm_api_check(). Instead of doing such
indirection, call to xfrm_api_check() directly and delete duplicated
functions.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
index 3fa066419d37..36d6c1835844 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
@@ -380,16 +380,6 @@ static int xfrm_api_check(struct net_device *dev)
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
-static int xfrm_dev_register(struct net_device *dev)
-{
- return xfrm_api_check(dev);
-}
-
-static int xfrm_dev_feat_change(struct net_device *dev)
-{
- return xfrm_api_check(dev);
-}
-
static int xfrm_dev_down(struct net_device *dev)
{
if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP)
@@ -404,10 +394,10 @@ static int xfrm_dev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void
switch (event) {
case NETDEV_REGISTER:
- return xfrm_dev_register(dev);
+ return xfrm_api_check(dev);
case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE:
- return xfrm_dev_feat_change(dev);
+ return xfrm_api_check(dev);
case NETDEV_DOWN:
case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists