netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: bcmgenet: Use stronger register read/writes to assure ordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2022 17:22:21 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
        Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        opendmb@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bcmgenet: Use stronger register read/writes to
 assure ordering

On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 14:26:36 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Maybe I should have refrained from making that comment after all :)
> Having the Fixes: tag dramatically helps with getting this patch applied
> all the way to the relevant stable trees and surely correctness over
> speed should prevail. If we want to restore the performance loss (with
> the onus on Doug and I to prove that there is a performance drop), then
> we could send a fix with the appropriate localized barrier followed by a
> revert of Jeremy's patch. And if we cared about getting those two
> patches applied to stable, we would tag them with the appropriate Fixes tag.
> 
> It looks like there are a few 'net' changes that showed up, are you
> going to send a pull request to Linus before 5.17 final is cut?

Not unless there's -rc9. We'll just merge net into net-next before
submitting net-next, most likely.