lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:01:04 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <>
        Saeed Mahameed <>,
        Eric Dumazet <>,
        Thomas Gleixner <>,
        Peter Zijlstra <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: remove lockdep asserts from ____napi_schedule()

On 2022-03-18 18:47:38 [-0600], Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> This reverts commit fbd9a2ceba5c ("net: Add lockdep asserts to
> ____napi_schedule()."). While good in theory, in practice it causes
> issues with various drivers, and so it can be revisited earlier in the
> cycle where those drivers can be adjusted if needed.

Do you plan to address to address the wireguard warning?

> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -4277,9 +4277,6 @@ static inline void ____napi_schedule(struct softnet_data *sd,
>  {
>  	struct task_struct *thread;
> -	lockdep_assert_softirq_will_run();
> -	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();

Could you please keep that lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled()? That is
needed regardless of the upper one.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists