netdev - Re: [PATCH] bpf: selftests: cleanup RLIMIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 20 Mar 2022 09:58:06 -0700
From:   Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
To:     Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: selftests: cleanup RLIMIT_MEMLOCK


> On Mar 19, 2022, at 11:08 PM, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> Since we have alread switched to memcg-based memory accouting and control,
> we don't need RLIMIT_MEMLOCK any more.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
> 
> ---
> RLIMIT_MEMLOCK is still used in bpftool and libbpf, but it may be useful
> for backward compatibility, so I don't cleanup them.

Hi Yafang!

As I remember, we haven’t cleaned selftests up with the same logic: it’s nice to be able to run the same version of tests on older kernels.

Thanks!