lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2022 09:58:06 -0700 From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev> To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: selftests: cleanup RLIMIT_MEMLOCK > On Mar 19, 2022, at 11:08 PM, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> wrote: > > Since we have alread switched to memcg-based memory accouting and control, > we don't need RLIMIT_MEMLOCK any more. > > Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> > Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev> > > --- > RLIMIT_MEMLOCK is still used in bpftool and libbpf, but it may be useful > for backward compatibility, so I don't cleanup them. Hi Yafang! As I remember, we haven’t cleaned selftests up with the same logic: it’s nice to be able to run the same version of tests on older kernels. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists