netdev - Re: [PATCH] can: mcba_usb: fix possible double dev_kfree_skb in mcba_usb_start

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:08:16 +0900
From:   Yasushi SHOJI <yashi@...cecubics.com>
To:     Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
Cc:     Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
        stefan.maetje@....eu, Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>,
        remigiusz.kollataj@...ica.com,
        linux-can <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: mcba_usb: fix possible double dev_kfree_skb in mcba_usb_start_xmit

Hi Hangyu,

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 5:02 PM Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com> wrote:
>
> There is no need to call dev_kfree_skb when usb_submit_urb fails beacause
> can_put_echo_skb deletes original skb and can_free_echo_skb deletes the cloned
> skb.

So, it's more like, "we don't need to call dev_kfree_skb() after
can_put_echo_skb()
because can_put_echo_skb() consumes the given skb.".  It seems it doesn't depend
on the condition of usb_submit_urb().  Plus, we don't see the "cloned
skb" at the
call site.

Would you mind adding a comment on can_put_echo_skb(), in a separate patch,
saying the fact that it consumes the skb?

ems_usb.c, gs_usb.c and possibly some others seem to call
dev_kfree_skb() as well.
Are they affected?

Best,
-- 
           yashi