lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:34:22 -0500 From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> Cc: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>, "huziji@...vell.com" <huziji@...vell.com>, "ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, "sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>, "adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, "thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com" <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, "kostap@...vell.com" <kostap@...vell.com>, "robert.marko@...tura.hr" <robert.marko@...tura.hr>, "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mvebu: Document bindings for AC5 On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 01:27:48AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > I think it can. I vaguely remember seeing conditional clauses based on > > compatible strings in other yaml bindings. > > > > I started a new binding document because I expected adding significant > > additions to the existing .txt files would be rejected. If I get some > > cycles I could look at converting the existing docs from txt to yaml. > > > > I'm not sure that there will be much in the way of a common > > mvebu-pinctrl.yaml as you'd end up repeating most of the common stuff to > > make things conditional anyway. > > We should wait for Rob to comment. But is suspect you are right, there > will not be much savings. It's always a judgement call of amount of if/then schema vs. duplicating the common parts. If it's the function/pin parts that vary, then that's probably best as separate schema for each case. Otherwise, I'm not sure without seeing something. Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists