[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220323123454.GW8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:34:54 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 bpf-next 1/1] rethook: x86: Add rethook x86
implementation
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 08:41:19PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Also, what's rethook for anyway?
>
> Rethook is a feature which hooks the function return. Most of the
> logic came from the kretprobe. Simply to say, 'kretprobe - kprobe' is
> the rethook :)
I got that far, but why did you take the bother to do these patches? Why
wasn't 'use kretprobe' a good enough option?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists