lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:34:23 -0700 From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com> To: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix maximum permitted number of arguments check On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:42:38AM +0800, Yuntao Wang wrote: > Since the m->arg_size array can hold up to MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS argument > sizes, it's ok that nargs is equal to MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists