netdev - Re: [RFC net-next 1/3] skbuff: add a basic intro doc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Mar 2022 08:16:49 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, imagedong@...cent.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, dsahern@...nel.org, talalahmad@...gle.com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/3] skbuff: add a basic intro doc

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:

> Add basic skb documentation. It's mostly an intro to the subsequent
> patches - it would looks strange if we documented advanced topics
> without covering the basics in any way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

Glad to see improved docs!  One nit...

>  Documentation/networking/skbuff.rst | 25 ++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/skbuff.h              | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/skbuff.rst
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/skbuff.rst b/Documentation/networking/skbuff.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7c6be64f486a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/skbuff.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +struct sk_buff
> +==============
> +
> +:c:type:`struct sk_buff` is the main networking structure representing
> +a packet.

You shouldn't need :c:type: here, our magic stuff should see "struct
sk_buff" and generate the cross reference.  Of course, it will be a
highly local reference in this case...

Thanks,

jon