netdev - Re: kselftest: net: tls: hangs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 Mar 2022 17:34:27 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: kselftest: net: tls: hangs

On 3/25/22 5:12 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 16:13:33 -0600 Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> # #  RUN           tls.13_sm4_gcm.splice_cmsg_to_pipe ...
>>> # # tls.c:688:splice_cmsg_to_pipe:Expected splice(self->cfd, NULL,
>>> p[1], NULL, send_len, 0) (10) == -1 (-1)
>>> # # tls.c:689:splice_cmsg_to_pipe:Expected errno (2) == EINVAL (22)
>>> # # splice_cmsg_to_pipe: Test terminated by timeout
>>> # #          FAIL  tls.13_sm4_gcm.splice_cmsg_to_pipe
>>> # not ok 217 tls.13_sm4_gcm.splice_cmsg_to_pipe
>>> # #  RUN           tls.13_sm4_gcm.splice_dec_cmsg_to_pipe ...
>>> # # tls.c:708:splice_dec_cmsg_to_pipe:Expected recv(self->cfd, buf,
>>> send_len, 0) (10) == -1 (-1)
>>> # # tls.c:709:splice_dec_cmsg_to_pipe:Expected errno (2) == EIO (5)
>>> [  661.901558] kworker/dying (49) used greatest stack depth: 10576 bytes left
>>
>> This seems to be the problem perhaps.
>>
>> Jakub, any thoughts. The last change to tls.c was a while back.
> 
> Yes, sorry, kicked off a build and got distracted.
> 
> I can repro the failures, TLS=n in the config I must have not tested
> that in the new cases.
> 
> But I can't repro the hung, and we have a timer at the hardness level
> IIUC so IDK how this could "hang"?
> 
> Naresh, is there any stack trace in the logs? Can you repro on Linus's
> tree?
> 

I couldn't reproduce this either - I have TLS=m

thanks,
-- Shuah