netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 5/6] ptp: Support late timestamp determination

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220325000432.GA18007@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 Mar 2022 17:04:32 -0700
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
Cc:     yangbo.lu@....com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, mlichvar@...hat.com,
        Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 5/6] ptp: Support late timestamp determination

On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 08:52:18PM +0100, Gerhard Engleder wrote:

> I thought that PTP packages are rare and that bloating the socket is
> not welcome.

Some PTP profiles use insanely high frame rates.  like G.8275.1 with
Sync and Delay Req at 16/sec each.  times the number of clients.

Bloating the skbuff is bad, but the `sock` is not so critical in its
storage costs.

Thanks,
Richard