lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:41:37 -0500 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] iwlwifi: mei: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:35:22PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 01:50:30PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare > > having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. > > Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these > > cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should > > no longer be used[2]. > > > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member > > [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.16/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays > > > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78 > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org> > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Hi all, Friendly ping: can someone take this, please? ...I can take this in my -next tree in the meantime. Thanks -- Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists