lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkCQs2kKE0CIzmC2@lunn.ch>
Date:   Sun, 27 Mar 2022 18:28:35 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        corbet@....net, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 03/13] docs: netdev: move the patch marking section up

> +How do I indicate which tree (net vs. net-next) my patch should be in?
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +To help maintainers and CI bots you should explicitly mark which tree
> +your patch is targeting. Assuming that you use git, use the prefix
> +flag::
> +
> +  git format-patch --subject-prefix='PATCH net-next' start..finish
> +
> +Use ``net`` instead of ``net-next`` (always lower case) in the above for
> +bug-fix ``net`` content.  If you don't use git, then note the only magic
> +in the above is just the subject text of the outgoing e-mail, and you
> +can manually change it yourself with whatever MUA you are comfortable
> +with.

Maybe we should consider removing the 'If you don't use git...' text.

We want people to use git.

Anybody who can correctly format a patch and get it passed their MTU
and mail system without it getting corrupted not using git should be
able to figure out how to set the subject line correctly.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ