netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] sch_cake: Take into account guideline DEF/DGSIC/36 from French Administration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bkxq5bgt.fsf@toke.dk>
Date:   Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:43:46 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        cake@...ts.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sch_cake: Take into account guideline
 DEF/DGSIC/36 from French Administration

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> writes:

> French Administration has written a guideline that defines additional
> DSCP values for use in its networks.

Huh, that's interesting!

> Add new CAKE diffserv tables to take those new values into account
> and add CONFIG_NET_SCH_CAKE_DGSIC to select those tables instead of
> the default ones.

...however I don't think we should be including something this
special-purpose into the qdisc kernel code, and certainly we shouldn't
have a config option that changes the meaning of the existing diffserv
keywords!

Rather, this is something that is best specified from userspace; and in
fact Cake already has no less than two different ways to do this: the
'fwmark' option, and setting the skb->priority field. Have you tried
using those?

-Toke