lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 28 Mar 2022 13:51:42 +0200
From:   Benjamin Stürz <>
To:     Kalle Valo <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] Replace comments with C99 initializers

On 28.03.22 11:33, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Benjamin Stürz <> writes:
>> This patch series replaces comments with C99's designated initializers
>> in a few places. It also adds some enum initializers. This is my first
>> time contributing to the Linux kernel, therefore I'm probably doing a
>> lot of things the wrong way. I'm sorry for that.
> Just a small tip: If you are new, start with something small and learn
> from that. Don't do a controversial big patchset spanning multiple
> subsystems, that's the hard way to learn things. First submit one patch
> at a time to one subsystem and gain understanding of the process that
> way.

I actually thought this would be such simple thing. Do you know of any
good thing where to start? I already looked into drivers/staging/*/TODO
and didn't found something for me personally.

Should I drop this patchset and start with something different? If yes,
what would the proper way to drop it? Just announcing, that this is
going nowhere in a separate patch?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists