netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 07/14] docs: netdev: rephrase the 'Under review' question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220329211730.71024b45@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 29 Mar 2022 21:17:30 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        corbet@....net, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        andrew@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 07/14] docs: netdev: rephrase the 'Under review'
 question

On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:33:05 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > -48h).  So be patient.  Asking the maintainer for status updates on your
> > +48h). But be patient, if your patch is active in patchwork (i.e. it's
> > +listed on the project's patch list) the chances it was missed are close to zero.
> > +Asking the maintainer for status updates on your
> >   patch is a good way to ensure your patch is ignored or pushed to the
> >   bottom of the priority list.  
> 
> I would reword that at some point, this feels a little bit retaliating.

Let me drop the last sentence, we can always at it back if people start
pinging us.