[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220330042505.2902770-8-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 21:24:58 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
f.fainelli@...il.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net v3 07/14] docs: netdev: rephrase the 'Under review' question
The semantics of "Under review" have shifted. Reword the question
about it a bit and focus it on the response time.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
---
v3: remove the going back to the end of the queue threat
---
Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
index e10a8140d642..00ac300ebe6a 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
@@ -116,10 +116,12 @@ patch. Patches are indexed by the ``Message-ID`` header of the emails
which carried them so if you have trouble finding your patch append
the value of ``Message-ID`` to the URL above.
-The above only says "Under Review". How can I find out more?
--------------------------------------------------------------
+How long before my patch is accepted?
+-------------------------------------
Generally speaking, the patches get triaged quickly (in less than
-48h). So be patient. Asking the maintainer for status updates on your
+48h). But be patient, if your patch is active in patchwork (i.e. it's
+listed on the project's patch list) the chances it was missed are close to zero.
+Asking the maintainer for status updates on your
patch is a good way to ensure your patch is ignored or pushed to the
bottom of the priority list.
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists