lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 31 Mar 2022 13:41:50 -0400
From:   Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        Benjamin Stürz <benni@...erz.xyz>
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
        gregory.clement@...tlin.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        linux@...tec.co.uk, krzk@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, robert.moore@...el.com,
        rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, lenb@...nel.org, 3chas3@...il.com,
        laforge@...monks.org, arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        mchehab@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com,
        rric@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl,
        mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com, jgg@...pe.ca,
        pali@...nel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, isdn@...ux-pingi.de,
        benh@...nel.crashing.org, fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com, ajd@...ux.ibm.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        nico@...xnic.net, loic.poulain@...aro.org, kvalo@...nel.org,
        pkshih@...ltek.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ica.org,
        linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        wcn36xx@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/22] rdmavt: Replace comments with C99 initializers

On 3/27/22 3:04 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 05:58:58PM +0100, Benjamin Stürz wrote:
>> This replaces comments with C99's designated
>> initializers because the kernel supports them now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Stürz <benni@...erz.xyz>
>> ---
>>  drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/rc.c | 62 +++++++++++++++----------------
>>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/rc.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/rc.c
>> index 4e5d4a27633c..121b8a23ac07 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/rc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/rc.c
>> @@ -10,37 +10,37 @@
>>   * Convert the AETH credit code into the number of credits.
>>   */
>>  static const u16 credit_table[31] = {
>> -	0,                      /* 0 */
>> -	1,                      /* 1 */
>> -	2,                      /* 2 */
>> -	3,                      /* 3 */
>> -	4,                      /* 4 */
>> -	6,                      /* 5 */
>> -	8,                      /* 6 */
>> -	12,                     /* 7 */
>> -	16,                     /* 8 */
>> -	24,                     /* 9 */
>> -	32,                     /* A */
>> -	48,                     /* B */
>> -	64,                     /* C */
>> -	96,                     /* D */
>> -	128,                    /* E */
>> -	192,                    /* F */
>> -	256,                    /* 10 */
>> -	384,                    /* 11 */
>> -	512,                    /* 12 */
>> -	768,                    /* 13 */
>> -	1024,                   /* 14 */
>> -	1536,                   /* 15 */
>> -	2048,                   /* 16 */
>> -	3072,                   /* 17 */
>> -	4096,                   /* 18 */
>> -	6144,                   /* 19 */
>> -	8192,                   /* 1A */
>> -	12288,                  /* 1B */
>> -	16384,                  /* 1C */
>> -	24576,                  /* 1D */
>> -	32768                   /* 1E */
>> +	[0x00] = 0,
>> +	[0x01] = 1,
>> +	[0x02] = 2,
>> +	[0x03] = 3,
>> +	[0x04] = 4,
>> +	[0x05] = 6,
>> +	[0x06] = 8,
>> +	[0x07] = 12,
>> +	[0x08] = 16,
>> +	[0x09] = 24,
>> +	[0x0A] = 32,
>> +	[0x0B] = 48,
>> +	[0x0C] = 64,
>> +	[0x0D] = 96,
>> +	[0x0E] = 128,
>> +	[0x0F] = 192,
>> +	[0x10] = 256,
>> +	[0x11] = 384,
>> +	[0x12] = 512,
>> +	[0x13] = 768,
>> +	[0x14] = 1024,
>> +	[0x15] = 1536,
>> +	[0x16] = 2048,
>> +	[0x17] = 3072,
>> +	[0x18] = 4096,
>> +	[0x19] = 6144,
>> +	[0x1A] = 8192,
>> +	[0x1B] = 12288,
>> +	[0x1C] = 16384,
>> +	[0x1D] = 24576,
>> +	[0x1E] = 32768
>>  };
> 
> I have hard time to see any value in this commit, why is this change needed?
> 

I tend to agree. This doesn't really improve things. It's a NAK from me.

-Denny

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ