[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <24a4aec56b6a94c1d54a0e81bc0af6efd29fd622.1648981571.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 14:06:35 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Paul Durrant <paul@....org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 23/27] udp/ipv6: optimise out daddr reassignment
There is nothing that checks daddr placement in udpv6_sendmsg(), so the
check reassigning it to ->sk_v6_daddr looks like a not needed anymore
artifact from the past. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
---
net/ipv6/udp.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
index cbb11316a526..2b5a3ed3f138 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
@@ -1417,14 +1417,6 @@ int udpv6_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
}
}
- /*
- * Otherwise it will be difficult to maintain
- * sk->sk_dst_cache.
- */
- if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED &&
- ipv6_addr_equal(daddr, &sk->sk_v6_daddr))
- daddr = &sk->sk_v6_daddr;
-
if (addr_len >= sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6) &&
sin6->sin6_scope_id &&
__ipv6_addr_needs_scope_id(__ipv6_addr_type(daddr)))
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists