netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/2] net: tc: dsa: Implement offload of matchall for bridged DSA ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 6 Apr 2022 11:24:46 +0200
From:   Mattias Forsblad <mattias.forsblad@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/2] net: tc: dsa: Implement offload of
 matchall for bridged DSA ports

On 2022-04-06 03:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon,  4 Apr 2022 12:48:24 +0200 Mattias Forsblad wrote:
>> Limitations
>> If there is tc rules on a bridge and all the ports leave the bridge
>> and then joins the bridge again, the indirect framwork doesn't seem
>> to reoffload them at join. The tc rules need to be torn down and
>> re-added.
> 
> You should unregister your callback when last DSA port leaves and
> re-register when first joins. That way you'll get replay.
> 

So I've tried that and it partially works. I get the FLOW_BLOCK_BIND
callback but tcf_action_reoffload_cb() bails out here (tc_act_bind() == 1):

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/sched/act_api.c?h=v5.18-rc1#n1819

B.c. that flag is set here:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/sched/cls_api.c?h=v5.18-rc1#n3088

I cannot say I fully understand this logic. Can you perhaps advise?

> Also the code needs to check the matchall is highest prio.

Isn't sufficient with this check?

	else if (flow_offload_has_one_action(&cls->rule->action) &&
		 cls->rule->action.entries[0].id == FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
		err = dsa_slave_add_cls_matchall_drop(dev, cls, ingress);

If it only has one action is must be the highest priority or am I 
missing something?