[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yk07bqnHhuT8QjS7@unreal>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:04:14 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 0/5] Drop Mellanox FPGA TLS support from the
kernel
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 03:08:14PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
>
> Mellanox INNOVA TLS cards are EOL in May, 2018 [1]. As such, the code
> is unmaintained, untested and not in-use by any upstream/distro oriented
> customers. In order to reduce code complexity, drop the kernel code,
> clean build config options and delete useless kTLS vs. TLS separation.
>
> [1] https://network.nvidia.com/related-docs/eol/LCR-000286.pdf
>
> Thanks
>
> BTW, the target of this series is mlx5-next, as other series removes
> FPGA IPsec together with relevant cleanup in RDMA side.
>
> Leon Romanovsky (5):
> net/mlx5_fpga: Drop INNOVA TLS support
> net/mlx5: Reliably return TLS device capabilities
> net/mlx5: Remove indirection in TLS build
> net/mlx5: Remove tls vs. ktls separation as it is the same
> net/mlx5: Cleanup kTLS function names and their exposure
>
Thanks, applied to mlx5-next.
7a9104ea9011 net/mlx5: Cleanup kTLS function names and their exposure
943aa7bda373 net/mlx5: Remove tls vs. ktls separation as it is the same
691f17b980d0 net/mlx5: Remove indirection in TLS build
e59437aa7ae6 net/mlx5: Reliably return TLS device capabilities
40379a0084c2 net/mlx5_fpga: Drop INNOVA TLS support
Powered by blists - more mailing lists