[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9e8d4940e6c4a3540d67ca3f13ca484@walle.cc>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 16:58:43 +0200
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: felix: suppress -EPROBE_DEFER errors
>> > > Should this be a patch with a Fixes tag?
>> >
>> > Whichever way you wish, no preference.
>>
>> I'll limit it to just the one dev_err() and add a Fixes,
>> there might be scripts out there who greps dmesg for errors.
>
> Ok.
Hum, it's not that easy. The issue goes back all the way
to the initial commit if I didn't miss anything (56051948773e).
That one was first included in 5.5, but dev_err_probe() wasn't
added until 5.9.
Thus will it work if I add Fixes: 56051948773e (..)?
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists