[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yk8nAnDcnPF5rC7N@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 11:01:38 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc: pkshih@...ltek.com, kvalo@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtw89: ser: add a break statement
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 01:53:49PM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> The clang build fails with
> ser.c:397:2: error: unannotated fall-through
> between switch labels [-Werror,-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
> default:
> ^
> The case above the default does not have a break.
> So add one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
There is also https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220407132316.61132-2-pkshih@realtek.com/.
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
I have been using Documentation/process/deprecated.rst as justification
for the extra break, warning aside, as all case statements must end in
one of the following:
break
fallthrough
continue
goto
return
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c
> index 25d1df10f226..5aebd6839d29 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c
> @@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ static void ser_idle_st_hdl(struct rtw89_ser *ser, u8 evt)
> break;
> case SER_EV_STATE_OUT:
> rtw89_hci_recovery_start(rtwdev);
> + break;
> default:
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists