netdev - [PATCH net-next 06/11] tls: rx: don't handle async in tls_sw_advance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220408183134.1054551-7-kuba@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri,  8 Apr 2022 11:31:29 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, borisp@...dia.com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        vfedorenko@...ek.ru, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 06/11] tls: rx: don't handle async in tls_sw_advance_skb()

tls_sw_advance_skb() caters to the async case when skb argument
is NULL. In that case it simply unpauses the strparser.

These are surprising semantics to a person reading the code,
and result in higher LoC, so inline the __strp_unpause and
only call tls_sw_advance_skb() when we actually move past
an skb.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
 net/tls/tls_sw.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 103a1aaca934..6f17f599a6d4 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -1616,17 +1616,14 @@ static bool tls_sw_advance_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 {
 	struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
 	struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);
+	struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
 
-	if (skb) {
-		struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
-
-		if (len < rxm->full_len) {
-			rxm->offset += len;
-			rxm->full_len -= len;
-			return false;
-		}
-		consume_skb(skb);
+	if (len < rxm->full_len) {
+		rxm->offset += len;
+		rxm->full_len -= len;
+		return false;
 	}
+	consume_skb(skb);
 
 	/* Finished with message */
 	ctx->recv_pkt = NULL;
@@ -1898,10 +1895,9 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
 		/* For async or peek case, queue the current skb */
 		if (async || is_peek || retain_skb) {
 			skb_queue_tail(&ctx->rx_list, skb);
-			skb = NULL;
-		}
-
-		if (tls_sw_advance_skb(sk, skb, chunk)) {
+			ctx->recv_pkt = NULL;
+			__strp_unpause(&ctx->strp);
+		} else if (tls_sw_advance_skb(sk, skb, chunk)) {
 			/* Return full control message to
 			 * userspace before trying to parse
 			 * another message type
-- 
2.34.1